<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 202 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359638</link>
    <description>Input service credit on civil construction service used for setting up factory premises is admissible under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, because services used in relation to setting up a factory fall within the inclusive definition of input service under Rule 2(l). The later exclusion of construction services was treated as prospective and not applicable to the period in dispute, so the credit claim remained allowable on the basis of binding jurisdictional precedent and the broader interpretation of input service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 06:32:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 202 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359638</link>
      <description>Input service credit on civil construction service used for setting up factory premises is admissible under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, because services used in relation to setting up a factory fall within the inclusive definition of input service under Rule 2(l). The later exclusion of construction services was treated as prospective and not applicable to the period in dispute, so the credit claim remained allowable on the basis of binding jurisdictional precedent and the broader interpretation of input service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>