<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 190 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359626</link>
    <description>The appeal of M/s Vraj Packaging Pvt. Ltd. was partly allowed, while the appeal of the Managing Director, Shri S.K. Babaria, was rejected. The Tribunal confirmed the demand and penalties imposed on the company, emphasizing the reliance on statements made during the panchanama where employees and buyers admitted to clearing bags as waste and making excess cash payments. The Tribunal extended the option to pay 25% of the penalty in accordance with the Central Excise Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 06:31:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518858" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 190 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359626</link>
      <description>The appeal of M/s Vraj Packaging Pvt. Ltd. was partly allowed, while the appeal of the Managing Director, Shri S.K. Babaria, was rejected. The Tribunal confirmed the demand and penalties imposed on the company, emphasizing the reliance on statements made during the panchanama where employees and buyers admitted to clearing bags as waste and making excess cash payments. The Tribunal extended the option to pay 25% of the penalty in accordance with the Central Excise Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>