<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 185 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359621</link>
    <description>The appeals were remanded to the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax (Appeals) - VADODARA-II for a fresh assessment, incorporating a Tribunal judgment. The Commissioner&#039;s order lacked reasoning and failed to address key manufacturing aspects. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a comprehensive reconsideration of the issues involved, allowing the appeals through remand for further examination based on the Tribunal&#039;s judgment in a related case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 185 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359621</link>
      <description>The appeals were remanded to the Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax (Appeals) - VADODARA-II for a fresh assessment, incorporating a Tribunal judgment. The Commissioner&#039;s order lacked reasoning and failed to address key manufacturing aspects. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a comprehensive reconsideration of the issues involved, allowing the appeals through remand for further examination based on the Tribunal&#039;s judgment in a related case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>