<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 184 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359620</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that the duty paid after the shifting of the manufacturing unit was admissible for cenvat credit. The Tribunal emphasized the continuity of liability and credit transfer in cases of unit mergers, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that the duty was recoverable for the past period but not admissible as credit for the successor unit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2018 06:31:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 184 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359620</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, holding that the duty paid after the shifting of the manufacturing unit was admissible for cenvat credit. The Tribunal emphasized the continuity of liability and credit transfer in cases of unit mergers, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument that the duty was recoverable for the past period but not admissible as credit for the successor unit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>