https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359616 The Tribunal set aside the denial of Cenvat credit of Rs. 39,711 due to quality variation, not short receipt, as evidenced by the appellant's debit notes for purity difference. Regarding the demand of Rs. 1,12,877 on scrap clearance, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority to investigate the duty liability on items other than metal scrap. The appellant agreed to discharge duty on metal scrap but contested duty on other items. Further assessment was deemed necessary. The appeal was disposed of with instructions for the Adjudicating Authority to determine liability on remaining scrap items and fly ash. en-us Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 May 2018 06:31:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359616 The Tribunal set aside the denial of Cenvat credit of Rs. 39,711 due to quality variation, not short receipt, as evidenced by the appellant's debit notes for purity difference. Regarding the demand of Rs. 1,12,877 on scrap clearance, the Tribunal remanded the matter to the Adjudicating Authority to investigate the duty liability on items other than metal scrap. The appellant agreed to discharge duty on metal scrap but contested duty on other items. Further assessment was deemed necessary. The appeal was disposed of with instructions for the Adjudicating Authority to determine liability on remaining scrap items and fly ash. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 29 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359616