https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359612 Steel bars and rods used in construction were considered in the context of works contract taxation under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The controversy was already governed by a Supreme Court ruling on the same tax question, which held that the higher rate applicable to goods used in execution of works contract was not attracted on the manner of use under consideration. On that binding authority, no substantial question of law survived for interference with the Tribunal's order, and the revision challenge was liable to fail. en-us Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 May 2018 06:30:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359612 Steel bars and rods used in construction were considered in the context of works contract taxation under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003. The controversy was already governed by a Supreme Court ruling on the same tax question, which held that the higher rate applicable to goods used in execution of works contract was not attracted on the manner of use under consideration. On that binding authority, no substantial question of law survived for interference with the Tribunal's order, and the revision challenge was liable to fail. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Thu, 22 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359612