<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1372 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272425</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the disputed services were eligible for Cenvat credit despite an amended provision. The appellant prevailed based on precedent cases, with the impugned order set aside and consequential relief granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 21:06:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1372 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272425</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the disputed services were eligible for Cenvat credit despite an amended provision. The appellant prevailed based on precedent cases, with the impugned order set aside and consequential relief granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>