https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272404 Under the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act, a special revenue remedy for disputes over record-of-rights entries does not, by itself, exclude civil jurisdiction. Clause (ee) in Section 87(1) enlarges the matters cognizable by the Revenue Officer, but it does not expressly or by necessary implication bar a civil suit for declaration of title and confirmation of possession challenging revenue entries. Section 258 operates only as a conditional bar where a prior decision under the specified provisions is sought to be varied, modified, or set aside, and exclusion of civil jurisdiction must be clearly established by the party asserting it. A civil suit of this kind therefore remains maintainable. en-us Thu, 11 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 May 2018 13:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272404 Under the Chotanagpur Tenancy Act, a special revenue remedy for disputes over record-of-rights entries does not, by itself, exclude civil jurisdiction. Clause (ee) in Section 87(1) enlarges the matters cognizable by the Revenue Officer, but it does not expressly or by necessary implication bar a civil suit for declaration of title and confirmation of possession challenging revenue entries. Section 258 operates only as a conditional bar where a prior decision under the specified provisions is sought to be varied, modified, or set aside, and exclusion of civil jurisdiction must be clearly established by the party asserting it. A civil suit of this kind therefore remains maintainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Dec 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272404