<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 167 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359603</link>
    <description>A refund or rebate claim under Notification No. 41/2012-ST had to be computed from the date of the Let Export Order, because the notification fixed that date as the statutory starting point for the one-year limitation period. The Tribunal held that this mandatory time limit could not be recast by using the date of receipt of invoices, and neither the departmental authorities nor the Tribunal could relax or rewrite the limitation absent express enabling provision. As the claim was filed beyond the prescribed period, it was time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2019 18:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518759" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 167 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359603</link>
      <description>A refund or rebate claim under Notification No. 41/2012-ST had to be computed from the date of the Let Export Order, because the notification fixed that date as the statutory starting point for the one-year limitation period. The Tribunal held that this mandatory time limit could not be recast by using the date of receipt of invoices, and neither the departmental authorities nor the Tribunal could relax or rewrite the limitation absent express enabling provision. As the claim was filed beyond the prescribed period, it was time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359603</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>