https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359599 The Tribunal rejected the rectification of mistake (ROM) application, emphasizing that reassessing the evidence and arguments would constitute a review of the order, beyond its jurisdiction. The decision was based on established legal principles and the precedent set by the Supreme Court, highlighting that all aspects had been considered before concluding the appeal lacked merit. The matter was concluded with the Tribunal's pronouncement in court. en-us Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 May 2018 06:25:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359599 The Tribunal rejected the rectification of mistake (ROM) application, emphasizing that reassessing the evidence and arguments would constitute a review of the order, beyond its jurisdiction. The decision was based on established legal principles and the precedent set by the Supreme Court, highlighting that all aspects had been considered before concluding the appeal lacked merit. The matter was concluded with the Tribunal's pronouncement in court. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 06 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359599