https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359590 The Court upheld the Income Tax Officer's decision to re-open assessments for the years 2010-2011 and 2011-2012. The appellant's challenge, based on the lack of specific direction from the CIT (A), was dismissed. The Court found the reasons given by the Income Tax Officer, including the appellant's failure to file returns and establish the source of investments, justified the re-opening. The appellant's appeal was dismissed for failing to meet statutory requirements, with no costs imposed. en-us Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Dec 2018 14:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359590 The Court upheld the Income Tax Officer's decision to re-open assessments for the years 2010-2011 and 2011-2012. The appellant's challenge, based on the lack of specific direction from the CIT (A), was dismissed. The Court found the reasons given by the Income Tax Officer, including the appellant's failure to file returns and establish the source of investments, justified the re-opening. The appellant's appeal was dismissed for failing to meet statutory requirements, with no costs imposed. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359590