<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 146 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359582</link>
    <description>The tribunal confirmed the exclusion of depreciation from operating costs for Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) determination. It disagreed with the adjustment proposed by the Transfer Pricing Officer for the purchase of DSP Software and IP rights, directing the Assessing Officer to accept the purchase price as at Arm&#039;s Length. The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 09:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 146 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359582</link>
      <description>The tribunal confirmed the exclusion of depreciation from operating costs for Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) determination. It disagreed with the adjustment proposed by the Transfer Pricing Officer for the purchase of DSP Software and IP rights, directing the Assessing Officer to accept the purchase price as at Arm&#039;s Length. The tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359582</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>