<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 135 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359571</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) totaling Rs. 1,23,13,672/- in unexplained investments, unsecured loans, and gifts received. The ITAT agreed that the A.O. lacked proper evidence for the additions and emphasized the need for accurate assessment. The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 06:24:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 135 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359571</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]&#039;s decision to delete additions made by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) totaling Rs. 1,23,13,672/- in unexplained investments, unsecured loans, and gifts received. The ITAT agreed that the A.O. lacked proper evidence for the additions and emphasized the need for accurate assessment. The ITAT dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>