<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 133 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359569</link>
    <description>The Tribunal quashed the re-assessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer, citing lack of tangible material and vague information as the basis for reopening. Consequently, the other grounds raised by the assessee, including additions of unexplained expenditure and transfer pricing adjustments, became academic and were not adjudicated. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 06:24:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 133 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359569</link>
      <description>The Tribunal quashed the re-assessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer, citing lack of tangible material and vague information as the basis for reopening. Consequently, the other grounds raised by the assessee, including additions of unexplained expenditure and transfer pricing adjustments, became academic and were not adjudicated. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>