https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359555 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order dated 30.04.2014, which sought to prevent recovery proceedings for service tax demand from January 2008 to September 2011. The Court held that the petitioner should have pursued alternative remedies available under the Act instead of directly approaching the Court. It emphasized that the classification issue of Goods Transport Agency or Goods Transport Operator required examination by the Appellate Tribunal. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings before the relevant forum, and no costs were awarded. en-us Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 May 2018 11:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359555 The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order dated 30.04.2014, which sought to prevent recovery proceedings for service tax demand from January 2008 to September 2011. The Court held that the petitioner should have pursued alternative remedies available under the Act instead of directly approaching the Court. It emphasized that the classification issue of Goods Transport Agency or Goods Transport Operator required examination by the Appellate Tribunal. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue appropriate proceedings before the relevant forum, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359555