<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 115 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359551</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the Revenue in part, remanding the case to determine the interest payable for upfront credit on capital goods. The penalty imposed under Rule 15(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules was set aside based on a Gujarat High Court judgment. The case was remanded for calculating the interest amount, resolving both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the respondent&#039;s cross-objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518707" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 115 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359551</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the Revenue in part, remanding the case to determine the interest payable for upfront credit on capital goods. The penalty imposed under Rule 15(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules was set aside based on a Gujarat High Court judgment. The case was remanded for calculating the interest amount, resolving both the Revenue&#039;s appeal and the respondent&#039;s cross-objection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>