https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359549 The appeal was filed against an order-in-appeal regarding a refund of excess service tax paid during a specific period. The appellant claimed a refund of the excess amount of service tax paid due to reduced bill amounts resulting from deficiencies in services provided to service receivers. The Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal citing non-amendment of work orders, but the Hon'ble Member (Judicial) allowed the appeal, stating that the excess service tax was rightfully claimed as a refund under Section 11B of the CEA, 1944, without the need to amend work orders. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. en-us Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359549 The appeal was filed against an order-in-appeal regarding a refund of excess service tax paid during a specific period. The appellant claimed a refund of the excess amount of service tax paid due to reduced bill amounts resulting from deficiencies in services provided to service receivers. The Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal citing non-amendment of work orders, but the Hon'ble Member (Judicial) allowed the appeal, stating that the excess service tax was rightfully claimed as a refund under Section 11B of the CEA, 1944, without the need to amend work orders. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359549