<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 101 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359537</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the court, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for verification. The court held that service tax paid on the premium for group insurance policies for employees/workmen is eligible due to Labour Laws. However, the eligibility of premium paid for coverage extended to family members depended on whether a separate premium was required for their inclusion. The court also questioned the eligibility of premium paid for employees stationed in Chennai but working in Vadodara, necessitating further verification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 06:21:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 101 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359537</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the court, remanding the matter to the adjudicating authority for verification. The court held that service tax paid on the premium for group insurance policies for employees/workmen is eligible due to Labour Laws. However, the eligibility of premium paid for coverage extended to family members depended on whether a separate premium was required for their inclusion. The court also questioned the eligibility of premium paid for employees stationed in Chennai but working in Vadodara, necessitating further verification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>