<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 88 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359524</link>
    <description>The appeals were allowed, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority for further proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and raised concerns about the jurisdictional issue regarding the show cause notice, leading to a decision in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 06:21:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518680" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 88 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359524</link>
      <description>The appeals were allowed, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority for further proceedings. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of adhering to principles of natural justice and raised concerns about the jurisdictional issue regarding the show cause notice, leading to a decision in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>