<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 1755 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272389</link>
    <description>Imported vehicle-conversion kits were treated as eligible for concessional additional duty under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. because an earlier order in the assessee&#039;s own case granting the same benefit had not been stayed and remained operative. The refund claim was also not barred by unjust enrichment, as a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate showed that the duty burden had not been passed on. On both issues, the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the appellate relief in favour of the assessee was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 06:19:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 1755 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272389</link>
      <description>Imported vehicle-conversion kits were treated as eligible for concessional additional duty under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus. because an earlier order in the assessee&#039;s own case granting the same benefit had not been stayed and remained operative. The refund claim was also not barred by unjust enrichment, as a Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate showed that the duty burden had not been passed on. On both issues, the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the appellate relief in favour of the assessee was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>