<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 1721 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272402</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Corporate Debtor through the Resolution Professional, setting aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order and extending the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for another 90 days from the date of the judgment. The Tribunal emphasized that the application for extension of time beyond 180 days can be filed within the initial 180 days if instructed by a resolution passed by the committee of creditors with a seventy-five percent majority vote. The decision highlighted the importance of adhering to the timelines set by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and ensuring a fair resolution process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2018 06:19:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 1721 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272402</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Corporate Debtor through the Resolution Professional, setting aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order and extending the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) for another 90 days from the date of the judgment. The Tribunal emphasized that the application for extension of time beyond 180 days can be filed within the initial 180 days if instructed by a resolution passed by the committee of creditors with a seventy-five percent majority vote. The decision highlighted the importance of adhering to the timelines set by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and ensuring a fair resolution process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>