<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reassessment – facts duly considered, no change in facts, not valid on mere change of opinion- Supreme Court re-affirms settled legal position. Some suggestions about re-assessment to avoid un-desirable litigation by revenue.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7984</link>
    <description>Reassessment cannot be sustained merely because the assessing officer has formed a different opinion where all relevant facts and enquiries were considered in the original assessment; the Supreme Court affirmed that notices issued and reassessments initiated on the same record, absent new tangible material, are void. The reported decision involved allowance of deductions in the original assessment, subsequent challenge based only on re-allocation of expenses from the same record, and rejection of reassessment as founded on change of opinion. The author recommends procedural reforms including a monetary threshold, recorded reasons with notice, and an opportunity to present objections before proceeding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 15:58:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 15:58:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reassessment – facts duly considered, no change in facts, not valid on mere change of opinion- Supreme Court re-affirms settled legal position. Some suggestions about re-assessment to avoid un-desirable litigation by revenue.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7984</link>
      <description>Reassessment cannot be sustained merely because the assessing officer has formed a different opinion where all relevant facts and enquiries were considered in the original assessment; the Supreme Court affirmed that notices issued and reassessments initiated on the same record, absent new tangible material, are void. The reported decision involved allowance of deductions in the original assessment, subsequent challenge based only on re-allocation of expenses from the same record, and rejection of reassessment as founded on change of opinion. The author recommends procedural reforms including a monetary threshold, recorded reasons with notice, and an opportunity to present objections before proceeding.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 15:58:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=7984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>