https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272381 The court upheld the validity of the Letter of Intent (LOI) issued to Respondent No. 2 for a hotel project, finding the bidding process transparent and awarding the LOI to the highest bidder. It determined that the respondent met eligibility criteria and that changes in evaluation criteria were transparent and non-discriminatory. Respondent No. 2's eligibility to participate in the tender process was affirmed, while the court emphasized the transparency and legality of the overall tender process. The court dismissed the writ petition, citing the petitioner's lack of standing and failure to show significant prejudice or public interest necessitating judicial intervention. en-us Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 May 2018 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272381 The court upheld the validity of the Letter of Intent (LOI) issued to Respondent No. 2 for a hotel project, finding the bidding process transparent and awarding the LOI to the highest bidder. It determined that the respondent met eligibility criteria and that changes in evaluation criteria were transparent and non-discriminatory. Respondent No. 2's eligibility to participate in the tender process was affirmed, while the court emphasized the transparency and legality of the overall tender process. The court dismissed the writ petition, citing the petitioner's lack of standing and failure to show significant prejudice or public interest necessitating judicial intervention. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 12 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272381