https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272379 The Court upheld the pre-qualification criteria set by the KSRTC in a tender process, finding them reasonable and not discriminatory. The criteria were aimed at ensuring quality materials and public safety, rather than excluding specific companies. The Court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in administrative actions related to tenders, stating that interference is only warranted if the decision is arbitrary or irrational. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's judgment in favor of the KSRTC's actions in setting high standards for tender eligibility. en-us Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 May 2018 12:01:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272379 The Court upheld the pre-qualification criteria set by the KSRTC in a tender process, finding them reasonable and not discriminatory. The criteria were aimed at ensuring quality materials and public safety, rather than excluding specific companies. The Court emphasized the limited scope of judicial review in administrative actions related to tenders, stating that interference is only warranted if the decision is arbitrary or irrational. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the High Court's judgment in favor of the KSRTC's actions in setting high standards for tender eligibility. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272379