https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272378 The High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioners' tender for item 1 due to non-compliance with the requirement to submit a test certificate by the specified date. However, the court directed the first respondent to reconsider the petitioners' tender for item 2 on its merits, as the technical specifications were included in Envelope No. 3. The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and the limitations of judicial review in commercial transactions and administrative decisions. en-us Wed, 09 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 May 2018 11:48:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272378 The High Court upheld the rejection of the petitioners' tender for item 1 due to non-compliance with the requirement to submit a test certificate by the specified date. However, the court directed the first respondent to reconsider the petitioners' tender for item 2 on its merits, as the technical specifications were included in Envelope No. 3. The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and the limitations of judicial review in commercial transactions and administrative decisions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 09 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272378