<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 886 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272376</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, finding that the rejection of the tender process was justified due to the respondent&#039;s failure to meet mandatory requirements. The Court concluded that the High Court misinterpreted the tender conditions and material on record, leading to an erroneous decision in favor of the respondent. As a result, the Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition, upheld the rejection of the tender, and found no merit in the review petition challenging the validity of the Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 886 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272376</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, finding that the rejection of the tender process was justified due to the respondent&#039;s failure to meet mandatory requirements. The Court concluded that the High Court misinterpreted the tender conditions and material on record, leading to an erroneous decision in favor of the respondent. As a result, the Supreme Court dismissed the writ petition, upheld the rejection of the tender, and found no merit in the review petition challenging the validity of the Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=272376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>