<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Upholds Different Roles for Creditors in Insolvency Proceedings Under 2016 Code; No Constitutional Violation Found.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39169</link>
    <description>Financial creditor versus Operational creditor - different treatment - right to be in the Committee of Creditors (COC) - The rationale of giving a particular treatment to a financial creditor in the process of insolvency of a company under the Code of 2016 cannot be said to offend any provisions of the Constitution of India - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 09:35:33 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 09:46:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Upholds Different Roles for Creditors in Insolvency Proceedings Under 2016 Code; No Constitutional Violation Found.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39169</link>
      <description>Financial creditor versus Operational creditor - different treatment - right to be in the Committee of Creditors (COC) - The rationale of giving a particular treatment to a financial creditor in the process of insolvency of a company under the Code of 2016 cannot be said to offend any provisions of the Constitution of India - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 09:35:33 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=39169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>