<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 30 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12851</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to rehear the appeals for the assessment years 1963-64, 1965-66, and 1966-67, emphasizing the need for the assessee to prove no fraud or negligence in not reporting correct income. Penalties imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act were canceled as the Tribunal found no evidence of fraud or negligence. The Tribunal was instructed to reconsider the matter in light of the relevant provisions of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:18:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 30 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12851</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to rehear the appeals for the assessment years 1963-64, 1965-66, and 1966-67, emphasizing the need for the assessee to prove no fraud or negligence in not reporting correct income. Penalties imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act were canceled as the Tribunal found no evidence of fraud or negligence. The Tribunal was instructed to reconsider the matter in light of the relevant provisions of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>