<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (11) TMI 54 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12850</link>
    <description>The High Court of Madras held that non-resident Indian partners in a firm were not liable to pay tax on income from the firm. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the additional tax imposed on the assessee under section 143(1A) was upheld. The inclusion of share income from the partnership firm was considered an adjustment permitted under section 143(1)(c), and additional tax was not chargeable under section 143(1A) for the assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:15:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51861" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (11) TMI 54 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12850</link>
      <description>The High Court of Madras held that non-resident Indian partners in a firm were not liable to pay tax on income from the firm. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to set aside the additional tax imposed on the assessee under section 143(1A) was upheld. The inclusion of share income from the partnership firm was considered an adjustment permitted under section 143(1)(c), and additional tax was not chargeable under section 143(1A) for the assessment years 1991-92 and 1992-93.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12850</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>