<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 59 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359495</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty of Rs. 52,83,477/- under Section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable due to the vague notice, complete disclosures by the assessee, and lack of evidence of intentional concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The penalty was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 06:25:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 59 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359495</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty of Rs. 52,83,477/- under Section 271(1)(c) was not sustainable due to the vague notice, complete disclosures by the assessee, and lack of evidence of intentional concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The penalty was deleted, and the assessee&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>