https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359477 The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) erred in passing the assessment order without proper examination, prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal held that the Pr. CIT failed to provide a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard, passing the order ex-parte in haste. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the case for fresh adjudication by the Pr. CIT, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice and ensuring a fair hearing for the assessee. As a result, the appeals of the assessees were allowed for statistical purposes, and the cases were remanded back to the Pr. CIT for reconsideration. en-us Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 May 2018 06:24:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359477 The Tribunal found that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT) erred in passing the assessment order without proper examination, prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal held that the Pr. CIT failed to provide a reasonable opportunity for the assessee to be heard, passing the order ex-parte in haste. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the case for fresh adjudication by the Pr. CIT, emphasizing adherence to principles of natural justice and ensuring a fair hearing for the assessee. As a result, the appeals of the assessees were allowed for statistical purposes, and the cases were remanded back to the Pr. CIT for reconsideration. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359477