<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 37 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359473</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter to the CIT(A) for a fresh review based on the accrual/crystallization of expenses in the assessment year. The ITAT emphasized that expenses under the mercantile system must accrue and crystallize during the year to be eligible for deduction, even if paid later. The AR&#039;s argument of fair estimation supported by detailed evidence was considered, directing the CIT(A) to reassess the claim accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 06:23:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 37 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359473</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, remanding the matter to the CIT(A) for a fresh review based on the accrual/crystallization of expenses in the assessment year. The ITAT emphasized that expenses under the mercantile system must accrue and crystallize during the year to be eligible for deduction, even if paid later. The AR&#039;s argument of fair estimation supported by detailed evidence was considered, directing the CIT(A) to reassess the claim accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>