https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359464 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad upheld the rejection of the appellant's refund claim of interest amounting to Rs. 16,10,764 for delay in service tax payment related to Advance Mobilization charges. The tribunal found that since the appellant did not contest the tax liability or file a refund claim, they were not entitled to seek interest on the tax liability. The argument that service tax liability was not required for services in a Special Economic Zone was dismissed as no refund claims were made. The tribunal concluded that the appellant's claim lacked merit and dismissed the appeal. en-us Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 May 2018 06:21:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359464 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad upheld the rejection of the appellant's refund claim of interest amounting to Rs. 16,10,764 for delay in service tax payment related to Advance Mobilization charges. The tribunal found that since the appellant did not contest the tax liability or file a refund claim, they were not entitled to seek interest on the tax liability. The argument that service tax liability was not required for services in a Special Economic Zone was dismissed as no refund claims were made. The tribunal concluded that the appellant's claim lacked merit and dismissed the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 12 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359464