<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 26 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision regarding the rejection of the VCES application, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions over internal circulars. The Revenue&#039;s argument challenging the delay in issuing the rejection notice was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding the Commissioner (Appeals) to have acted within jurisdiction. The decision underscored the significance of statutory provisions, interpretation of time-limits, and the authority of the Commissioner (Appeals) in VCES cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 06:21:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 26 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision regarding the rejection of the VCES application, emphasizing adherence to statutory provisions over internal circulars. The Revenue&#039;s argument challenging the delay in issuing the rejection notice was dismissed, with the Tribunal finding the Commissioner (Appeals) to have acted within jurisdiction. The decision underscored the significance of statutory provisions, interpretation of time-limits, and the authority of the Commissioner (Appeals) in VCES cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>