<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (8) TMI 29 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12845</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete a sum from the assessee&#039;s net wealth for multiple assessment years, clarifying that only received compensation should be considered, not the value of the plot. The right to compensation was deemed an asset for wealth tax purposes, with future compensation taxable upon receipt. The court emphasized assessing the present value of future compensation and confirmed that any further compensation received would be subject to taxation in the hands of the recipient.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 15:06:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (8) TMI 29 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12845</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete a sum from the assessee&#039;s net wealth for multiple assessment years, clarifying that only received compensation should be considered, not the value of the plot. The right to compensation was deemed an asset for wealth tax purposes, with future compensation taxable upon receipt. The court emphasized assessing the present value of future compensation and confirmed that any further compensation received would be subject to taxation in the hands of the recipient.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12845</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>