<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 22 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359458</link>
    <description>The appellant contested the requirement to pay interest for inadmissible Cenvat credit between July 2011 and August 2015. The Tribunal ruled that interest was only due for the period before 17.03.2012, and post an amendment to Rule 14, no interest was payable if the credit was reversed. Thus, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, permitting a refund of interest on the credit reversed after 17.03.2012, and remanded the matter for calculating interest post that date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 06:21:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 22 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359458</link>
      <description>The appellant contested the requirement to pay interest for inadmissible Cenvat credit between July 2011 and August 2015. The Tribunal ruled that interest was only due for the period before 17.03.2012, and post an amendment to Rule 14, no interest was payable if the credit was reversed. Thus, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, permitting a refund of interest on the credit reversed after 17.03.2012, and remanded the matter for calculating interest post that date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359458</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>