<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 5 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal was required to independently examine the assessee&#039;s entitlement to incentive benefits under the State incentive scheme, as that claim arose from an eligibility certificate and investment-based exemption scheme and was distinct from the issue of tax liability under the Central sales tax regime for non-furnishing of C/D declaration forms. By proceeding only on the tax-rate question without addressing the separate incentive claim, the Tribunal failed to consider a material aspect requiring adjudication. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration by the Tribunal, and the revision petition succeeded to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 5 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal was required to independently examine the assessee&#039;s entitlement to incentive benefits under the State incentive scheme, as that claim arose from an eligibility certificate and investment-based exemption scheme and was distinct from the issue of tax liability under the Central sales tax regime for non-furnishing of C/D declaration forms. By proceeding only on the tax-rate question without addressing the separate incentive claim, the Tribunal failed to consider a material aspect requiring adjudication. The matter was therefore remitted for fresh consideration by the Tribunal, and the revision petition succeeded to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>