<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1118 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200910</link>
    <description>Appeals in customs litigation were not entertained because the Court found no cogent reason for interference with the impugned judgment. The Civil Appeals were dismissed both on the ground of delay and on merits, leaving the lower decision undisturbed. The order reflects that where delay is not satisfactorily explained and the merits disclose no error warranting interference, appellate relief will not be granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 05:20:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518516" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1118 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200910</link>
      <description>Appeals in customs litigation were not entertained because the Court found no cogent reason for interference with the impugned judgment. The Civil Appeals were dismissed both on the ground of delay and on merits, leaving the lower decision undisturbed. The order reflects that where delay is not satisfactorily explained and the merits disclose no error warranting interference, appellate relief will not be granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>