<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (5) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359438</link>
    <description>The Court remanded the case to the Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Appeals) for fresh consideration on two re-framed substantial questions of law regarding the valuation of property under the Wealth Tax Act. The Tax Case Appeal was allowed, the previous order was set aside, and the matter was directed for a new decision focusing on the specified issues. The Court emphasized that the re-framed questions should be given fresh consideration in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 05:20:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (5) TMI 2 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359438</link>
      <description>The Court remanded the case to the Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Appeals) for fresh consideration on two re-framed substantial questions of law regarding the valuation of property under the Wealth Tax Act. The Tax Case Appeal was allowed, the previous order was set aside, and the matter was directed for a new decision focusing on the specified issues. The Court emphasized that the re-framed questions should be given fresh consideration in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>