https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200886 An illegal strike during pending conciliation proceedings was treated as unjustified under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, while the lock-out was not rendered illegal merely because it continued after the strike ended. The disciplinary relief depended on individual conduct: dismissal of six workmen was found unsustainable and reinstatement was confirmed, but the dismissal of two workmen was upheld on the basis of a proper domestic inquiry and absence of victimisation. The 37 workmen convicted under section 188 of the Indian Penal Code were denied reinstatement, and for the remaining workmen the defective inquiry and participation in an illegal strike justified only reduced back wages rather than full relief. en-us Wed, 14 Oct 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 May 2018 10:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200886 An illegal strike during pending conciliation proceedings was treated as unjustified under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, while the lock-out was not rendered illegal merely because it continued after the strike ended. The disciplinary relief depended on individual conduct: dismissal of six workmen was found unsustainable and reinstatement was confirmed, but the dismissal of two workmen was upheld on the basis of a proper domestic inquiry and absence of victimisation. The 37 workmen convicted under section 188 of the Indian Penal Code were denied reinstatement, and for the remaining workmen the defective inquiry and participation in an illegal strike justified only reduced back wages rather than full relief. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Oct 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200886