<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (5) TMI 253 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200882</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal against the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal award due to a delay in filing the appeal by the appellant, an insurer. Despite obtaining the judgment within the limitation period, inter-departmental delays and negligence in decision-making were cited as reasons for the delay. The Court emphasized the need to show sufficient cause for delay and exercised judicial discretion in the interest of justice. The appellant&#039;s negligence in contesting the case before the tribunal was deemed separate from the delay in filing the appeal. Ultimately, the Court found no justification to condone the delay and dismissed the case without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 11:40:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (5) TMI 253 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200882</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal against the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal award due to a delay in filing the appeal by the appellant, an insurer. Despite obtaining the judgment within the limitation period, inter-departmental delays and negligence in decision-making were cited as reasons for the delay. The Court emphasized the need to show sufficient cause for delay and exercised judicial discretion in the interest of justice. The appellant&#039;s negligence in contesting the case before the tribunal was deemed separate from the delay in filing the appeal. Ultimately, the Court found no justification to condone the delay and dismissed the case without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>