https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200881 The Supreme Court overruled the High Court's decision and granted the plaintiff a mortgage decree for the amount claimed in the plaint along with interest and costs. The Court held that the document at exhibit 7(a) did not require registration under the Registration Act as it was not intended to be an integral part of the transaction creating an interest in immovable property. The Court rejected the argument that exhibits 7(b) and 12 required registration, finding that they did not contain essential details for a mortgage. The plaintiff was granted a mortgage decree with a provision for property sale if the defendants failed to pay within six months. en-us Mon, 01 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 30 Apr 2018 10:35:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200881 The Supreme Court overruled the High Court's decision and granted the plaintiff a mortgage decree for the amount claimed in the plaint along with interest and costs. The Court held that the document at exhibit 7(a) did not require registration under the Registration Act as it was not intended to be an integral part of the transaction creating an interest in immovable property. The Court rejected the argument that exhibits 7(b) and 12 required registration, finding that they did not contain essential details for a mortgage. The plaintiff was granted a mortgage decree with a provision for property sale if the defendants failed to pay within six months. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 01 Feb 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200881