<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1541 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359430</link>
    <description>The Court found that the final order of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence was unsustainable due to a breach of natural justice. It emphasized the petitioner&#039;s right to cross-examine witnesses, including DRI officials and panchas, and criticized the arbitrary closure of witness cross-examination. The Court granted the petitioner access to seized documents for inspection and directed a fair adjudication process. The judgment made specific directions on cross-examination and document inspection, while keeping jurisdictional issues open for further consideration, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 06:12:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1541 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359430</link>
      <description>The Court found that the final order of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence was unsustainable due to a breach of natural justice. It emphasized the petitioner&#039;s right to cross-examine witnesses, including DRI officials and panchas, and criticized the arbitrary closure of witness cross-examination. The Court granted the petitioner access to seized documents for inspection and directed a fair adjudication process. The judgment made specific directions on cross-examination and document inspection, while keeping jurisdictional issues open for further consideration, ultimately ruling in favor of the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>