<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1532 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359421</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as they were based on a change of opinion and initiated after four years without any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts. The decision of the Appellate Commissioner and Tribunal was upheld, emphasizing the principle that reassessment cannot be justified by a mere change of opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 06:11:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1532 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359421</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeal, affirming that the reassessment proceedings were invalid as they were based on a change of opinion and initiated after four years without any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose material facts. The decision of the Appellate Commissioner and Tribunal was upheld, emphasizing the principle that reassessment cannot be justified by a mere change of opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>