<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1528 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of bad debts claimed by the assessee under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the AO was instructed to re-evaluate the valuation of closing inventory using the prescribed accounting standards, specifically Accounting Standard-2, and to consider the cost or market rate method for valuation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 09:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1528 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the disallowance of bad debts claimed by the assessee under Section 36(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Additionally, the AO was instructed to re-evaluate the valuation of closing inventory using the prescribed accounting standards, specifically Accounting Standard-2, and to consider the cost or market rate method for valuation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>