<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1520 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359409</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal regarding the disallowance of interest paid on a loan for investment in a foreign company. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions under sections 40(a)(i) and 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing consistency in previous rulings and the importance of business purpose in determining allowable expenses. The judgment cited relevant precedents to support these decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 06:11:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1520 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359409</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal regarding the disallowance of interest paid on a loan for investment in a foreign company. Additionally, the Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the additions under sections 40(a)(i) and 40(a)(ia) of the Income-tax Act, emphasizing consistency in previous rulings and the importance of business purpose in determining allowable expenses. The judgment cited relevant precedents to support these decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>