<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1499 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359388</link>
    <description>The tribunal held that repair and maintenance costs incurred by the lessee should not be included in the taxable value for renting immovable property. The demand related to these costs was set aside, but the appellant was held liable for interest on lease rent. Penalties imposed on the appellant were revoked since the repair and maintenance costs were not considered in the taxable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 07:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1499 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359388</link>
      <description>The tribunal held that repair and maintenance costs incurred by the lessee should not be included in the taxable value for renting immovable property. The demand related to these costs was set aside, but the appellant was held liable for interest on lease rent. Penalties imposed on the appellant were revoked since the repair and maintenance costs were not considered in the taxable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>