https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359386 The court ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the amount deposited under protest was not a double payment of tax. The limitation period for the refund claim was deemed to start from the date of the decision by the Commissioner (Appeals), not from the date of the deposit. The court allowed the appeal, granting the appellant CENVAT credit and immediate effect to their application. en-us Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 29 Apr 2018 13:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359386 The court ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the amount deposited under protest was not a double payment of tax. The limitation period for the refund claim was deemed to start from the date of the decision by the Commissioner (Appeals), not from the date of the deposit. The court allowed the appeal, granting the appellant CENVAT credit and immediate effect to their application. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 01 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359386