<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1494 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359383</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Lower Authority&#039;s dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the availment of Cenvat credit on Service Tax. The Tribunal found that the Lower Authorities failed to consider the documentary evidence provided by the appellant, leading to an unjust dismissal. The matter was remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority for re-adjudication after a thorough review of the documents. The issue of time bar on the demand for credit availed in March 2013 was not explicitly addressed but will likely be revisited during the re-examination. The judgment emphasizes the importance of a fair review process and thorough consideration of evidence in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2018 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1494 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359383</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Lower Authority&#039;s dismissal of the appellant&#039;s appeal regarding the availment of Cenvat credit on Service Tax. The Tribunal found that the Lower Authorities failed to consider the documentary evidence provided by the appellant, leading to an unjust dismissal. The matter was remanded to the Original Adjudicating Authority for re-adjudication after a thorough review of the documents. The issue of time bar on the demand for credit availed in March 2013 was not explicitly addressed but will likely be revisited during the re-examination. The judgment emphasizes the importance of a fair review process and thorough consideration of evidence in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>