<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1487 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359376</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay remanded the case back to the Tribunal to reconsider the deletion of specific words in the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Court noted discrepancies between the English and Marathi versions of the Gazette publication of the amending Act and emphasized the need to determine the correct legislative intent. The Tribunal was instructed to review both versions of the Gazette publication to ensure an accurate interpretation aligning with the Legislature&#039;s intent. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and emphasized the importance of resolving the discrepancy for a conclusive interpretation of the legislative amendment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2018 06:08:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=518406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1487 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359376</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay remanded the case back to the Tribunal to reconsider the deletion of specific words in the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002. The Court noted discrepancies between the English and Marathi versions of the Gazette publication of the amending Act and emphasized the need to determine the correct legislative intent. The Tribunal was instructed to review both versions of the Gazette publication to ensure an accurate interpretation aligning with the Legislature&#039;s intent. The Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order and emphasized the importance of resolving the discrepancy for a conclusive interpretation of the legislative amendment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=359376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>